<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further study on duplicate elements of HashSet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.genius-field.com/2009/04/22/further-study-on-duplicate-elements-of-hashset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.genius-field.com/2009/04/22/further-study-on-duplicate-elements-of-hashset/</link>
	<description>Your world starts from here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icyfish</title>
		<link>http://blog.genius-field.com/2009/04/22/further-study-on-duplicate-elements-of-hashset/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Icyfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genius-field.com/?p=40#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Because we&#039;d like to see whether the equals method or the hashCode method will be used to check the equality of two elements. The equals method will return true or false and the hashCode will give us two different or same integers. So we combine the return values of these two methods to see which one(or both two) will affect the result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because we&#8217;d like to see whether the equals method or the hashCode method will be used to check the equality of two elements. The equals method will return true or false and the hashCode will give us two different or same integers. So we combine the return values of these two methods to see which one(or both two) will affect the result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hello</title>
		<link>http://blog.genius-field.com/2009/04/22/further-study-on-duplicate-elements-of-hashset/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>hello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genius-field.com/?p=40#comment-9</guid>
		<description>didn&#039;t understand what you mean by 4 combinations like 
&quot;So, there’re four combinations:
1. true same
2. true different
3. false same
4. false different
&quot;
please explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t understand what you mean by 4 combinations like<br />
&#8220;So, there’re four combinations:<br />
1. true same<br />
2. true different<br />
3. false same<br />
4. false different<br />
&#8221;<br />
please explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

